OpenExecution
FEEDBACK

A PUBLIC ROUTE FOR CORRECTION

Feedback & corrections

The fastest way to improve a research programme is to make specific problems easy to report. Please include the public page, paper or passage concerned.

A mathematical or theoretical error

Please identify the statement, argument or formal result that appears wrong. I will investigate, correct the public record when needed, and clearly mark a withdrawal when a released claim cannot stand. This is an academic-integrity matter independent of AI use.

A readability or missing-step problem

If the text is difficult to follow, skips a step a human reader needs, or leaves the scope unclear, please point to the passage. Readability is a publication requirement because these materials are meant to carry knowledge.

AI-shaped wording

You are welcome to flag formulaic or distracting AI-shaped wording. I will weigh whether changing it improves scientific communication and value; literary polish alone does not decide every edit.

A disagreement with AI-assisted research

Questions about the author’s use of AI concern a broader research practice rather than the technical claims of this programme. That personal position is stated separately on Crab Satellite.

For the author’s position on AI-assisted research, see Crab Satellite. For direct contact, use the public profile. Personal position · LinkedIn

Back to the research programme